Glad to meet you Mr.Friedrich Nietzsche!
I recently posted a question on the group - 'Deceit of the selfish mind' asking What actually is enlightenment?
So I started to take interest and look up some things on my own. Now what I came across is this article called Human , All Too Human which is a book by Friedrich Nietzsche. It's not like I've never heard the name before.I probably even have some of his quotes in the my quotes section, though then I hardly knew something about him.
I was pleasantly surprised when I came across this excerpt from the book...
Excerpt:
"At the waterfall. When we see a waterfall, we think we see freedom of will and choice in the innumerable turnings, windings, breakings of the waves; but everything is necessary; each movement can be calculated mathematically. Thus it is with human actions; if one were omniscient, one would be able to calculate each individual action in advance, each step in the progress of knowledge, each error, each act of malice. To be sure the acting man is caught in his illusion of volition; if the wheel of the world were to stand still for a moment and an omniscient, calculating mind were there to take advantage of this interruption, he would be able to tell into the farthest future of each being and describe every rut that wheel will roll upon. The acting man's delusion about himself, his assumption that free will exists, is also part of the calculable mechanism."
Why? Because few days ago I wrote this entry Is there no randomness?
It's actually very strange.Even when two people discuss about something, they don't sound so similar while saying it. Both of us pointing out choice and calculation.
There are other things that are funnily similar to what I think. Like just taken out of my head. He didn't like the idea of war and nationalism. The arguments. The direction.
And finally this...
“He who has come only in part to a freedom of reason cannot feel on earth otherwise than as a wanderer.”
Maybe it's the health. Well he also ended up with a mental breakdown, something which I strongly predict for myself. ;)
Even this....
Wherever progress is to ensue, deviating natures are of greatest importance. Every progress of the whole must be preceded by a partial weakening. The strongest natures retain the type, the weaker ones help to advance it. Something similar also happens in the individual. There is rarely a degeneration, a truncation, or even a vice or any physical or moral loss without an advantage somewhere else. In a warlike and restless clan, for example, the sicklier man may have occasion to be alone, and may therefore become quieter and wiser; the one-eyed man will have one eye the stronger; the blind man will see deeper inwardly, and certainly hear better. To this extent, the famous theory of the survival of the fittest does not seem to me to be the only viewpoint from which to explain the progress of strengthening of a man or of a race.
Considering Darwin, the approach. I've considered this. More to survival of the fittest. It's the resources being diverted.What was distributed between the two now goes to one (the survivor) making it stronger.
So I decided to go just a little further and look at all his quotes. I ended up finding just more surprises. I could so relate, so similar to words in my head, and it sounds crappy, but kind of a deja vu.
Quotes -
-"You must have chaos within you to give birth to a dancing star."
-"Truths are illusions of which one has forgotten that they are illusions."
-"At bottom every man knows well enough that he is a unique being, only once on this earth; and by no extraordinary chance with such a marvelously picturesque piece of diversity in unity as he is, ever be put together a second time."
-"For believe me: the secret for harvesting from existence the greatest fruitfulness and greatest enjoyment is - to live dangerously."
-"A man's maturity consists in having found again the seriousness one had as a child, at play."
-"What else is love but understanding and rejoicing in the fact that another person lives, acts, and experiences otherwise than we do and crosswise to our purposes? For love to bridge these opposites through joy it must not eliminate or deny them."
-"There is always some madness in love. But there is also always some reason in madness."
-"Is man merely a mistake of God's? Or God merely a mistake of man's?"
-"Freedom is the will to be responsible to ourselves."
-"I would believe only in a God that knows how to dance."
-"Be careful lest, in casting out your demons, you cast out the best thing that is in you."
-"And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music."
And most others, I just put up a few.Neither did I put up everything, not just regarding quotes, but also views.
He was smart with saying the principle of eternal return.Though if we have similar heads, I could actually say why he came up with this absurd idea.Maybe later someday.
Not that this means anything at all, or that makes me right or something like that.It's just funny.It's like we used the same head. Only he was a lot better at writing skills and more intense.But the ideas, the approach, the thinking, and the feeling are so very similar.The essence of it all.Though I don't still know much. But ,well, it was fun to see this.And also slightly freaky. ;)









